Lawmakers Pitch Cuts, Reforms to Congressional Pensions

Six House members testifying before the Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee on Federal Workforce, U.S. Postal Service and Labor Policy advocated new ways to cut retirement benefits for themselves and the rest of Congress.

“Our national debt has topped $15 trillion, and the federal government borrows 42 cents for every dollar it spends,” said Rep. Tim Griffin (R-Ark.). “The American taxpayer can no longer afford to pay for the retirement benefits of members of Congress.”

Griffin is pushing for legislation that would eliminate congressional pensions for future members and have them rely solely on the Thrift Savings Plan, Congresses version of a 401(k) plan.

Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.) one ups Griffin, advocating the elimination of pensions for current members as well. His office says that move could save more than $13 million per year for the current Congress alone.

Other lawmakers have come forward with alternatives to the slash-and-burn proposals of Coffman and Griffin.

Rep. Howard Coble (R-N.C.) wants to lengthen the time of service required for a member to be eligible for a pension.

“It extends the time required from five years to 12 years before a member is vested in an annuity under the Federal Employee Retirement System,” he testified. “It is the equivalent of two terms in the Senate or six terms in the House or any combination of the two.”

Coble’s proposal would only apply to future members, not those who have already been elected.

Rep. Bobby Schilling (R-Ill.) Congressional Retirement Age Act would tie lawmakers’ pension eligibility to the Social Security retirement age of 65. Members are currently eligible to receive pension benefits at age 62 after five years of service, or as early as age 50 after 25 years of service.

Schilling estimates a savings of up to $15 million over 10 years. The proposal has received bipartisan support, with 26 co-sponsors in the House, including subcommittee members Reps. Dennis Ross (R-Fla.) and Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).

Instead of making definitive changes to the pension system, Rep. Rich Nugent (R-Fla.) wants to give members a choice.

His Congress is Not a Career Act would allow members of the House elected after September 2003 to opt out of receiving pension benefits.

“I was shocked when the [congressional] benefits representative told me that I was legally required to accept a congressional pension, as long as I was here for at least five years,” he testified. “Similarly, I couldn’t contribute to a [Thrift Savings Plan] without a federal match. Even more, if I didn’t put a single penny into the TSP, the government would still contribute a match of one percent of my salary, without any cost to me.”

The legislation from the former Hernando County sheriff is “about allowing those of us who don’t view this institution as a career, who don’t think that we should get a pension for serving our country, who don’t think we should be enriching ourselves while sitting in the peoples’ House, the ability to opt out,” he added.

Rep. Robert Dold (R-Ill.) cited a recent National Taxpayers Union study that estimated “federal lawmakers convicted of various crimes are currently drawing a combined pension benefit of more than $800,000 per year.”

According to Dold, that does not include convicted lawmakers who are so far ineligible for receiving their pension, or whose public corruption cases are still pending in the courts. The Honest Leadership and Open Government Act, signed into law by former President George W. Bush in 2007, also only holds that members forfeit their pension if the crimes for which they were convicted occurred while they served in Congress.

Last June, Dold and Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) introduced the Congressional Integrity and Pension Forfeiture Act, prohibiting a former member of Congress from receiving a congressional pension if they are convicted of an offense that occurred while subsequently serving in any publicly elected office.

The bill also adds 20 additional covered public corruption crimes for which, if convicted, a member would forfeit his pension benefits. Though cost savings would not be as significant as other bills proposed before the subcommittee, Dold said public trust is at stake.

“This legislation will help in our ongoing efforts to restore public trust in this institution and those who serve in it,” he testified.

As Congress faces its lowest approval ratings in memory, and the few Americans who still receive pension benefits have seen them plummet during the economic downturn, it’s left to members to reconcile their benefits against their own constituents’.

“I just think this is a sore spot with a lot of Americans, that members of Congress have a benefit that’s not available to most,” Coffman said in November.


1 Comment

  1. It’s not that the tax payer can’t afford it, it’s that these idiots don’t deserve it.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s